|
Typical
Problems with Group-Written Documents |
|
Main
Problem
Each individual in the group sees himself as responsible for
only a small piece of the whole. The individuals in the group
fail to understand the design, scheduling, and production of
the entire document and consequently write and schedule their
own pieces of the whole according to their own departmental
standards and priorities, not according to the standards and
priorities of the group project.
|
Eight More Problems |
|
1. The document
addresses different audiences and different purposes between
sections.
|
|
2.
Parts of the document overlap in coverage, with the same material
being treated more than once and not always in the same way.
|
3.
Parts of the document are not consistent with other parts in
terms of their structure, content, and design.
|
4.
Parts of the document are not consistent with other parts in
terms of style, terminology, and method of address to the audience.
|
5.
The document is graphically and physically inconsistent from
section to section.
|
6. The time available for correction, editing, and production
is substantially underestimated and therefore the final draft
appears unfinished.
|
|
7.
Sections of the document do not get written until the last minute
(if at all) because no one has had apparent responsibility to
write them. This is especially true of preliminaries such as
the cover page, abstract, table of contents, lists of figures
and tables, and acknowledgements.
|
8. Many
of these problems stem from the fact that the responsibilities
for parts of group-written documents are usually assigned in
terms of subject matter, not in terms of parts of the document. |
|
Adapted from Mathes & Stevenson, Designing Technical Reports, 1991
|