| A. Use
the following responses for each item and type of evaluation:
NA = not applicable in this
instance |
|||
| Conduct one-to-one and small group or expert review formative evaluations with target learners. Is there evidence that learners: | One-to-One | Small Group | Expert Review |
| - are representative of the target group? | |||
| - were provided with an orientation to the instruction and to put them at ease? | |||
| - were provided with all necessary materials (preinstruction through transfer)? | |||
| - completed and commented on pretest (including entry behaviors)? | |||
| - marked unclear passages and underlined unfamiliar vocabulary? | |||
| - questioned unfamiliar examples and suggested alternatives? | |||
| - completed the posttest and commented on unclear items? | |||
| - completed the attitude questionnaire and commented on the clarity of questions as well as their opinions? | |||
| - were comfortable with media and delivery system? | |||
| - expert reviewers were either content experts or instructional experts? | |||
| - expert reviewers provided data to verify instructional integrity? | |||
| - expert reviewers provided feedback to verify that instruction would be reliable over time with different groups within the overall instructional audience? | |||
| B. Data Collection, Analysis, and Discussion | |||
| - were sufficient data collected to conduct evaluation? | |||
| - were data analyzed correctly? | |||
| - were data presented in a logical manner (tables, figures, or descriptive summaries)? | |||
| - were learner's comments and responses summarized? | |||
| - were strengths or weaknesses uncovered during evaluation described adequately? | |||
codone_s@mercer.edu
Office: 478-301-4185