Grading Rubric for Assignment 3.1 of the Instructional Design Plan
Objectives and Assessment
(40 points total)

Assignment 3.1. Performance Objectives and Assessment Instruments

Performance Objectives (including Terminal Objective) (30 points)

Performance Objectives
     

Do the conditions

Yes
No
Not
relevant

  - specify cue or stimulus provided to learners?

     

  - specify resource materials needed?

     

  - control complexity of task for learners' needs?

     

  - aid transfer to performance context

     
Is the behavior Yes No
Not
relevant

  - congruent with the behavior in the anchor step of the instructional goal analysis?

     
  - the actual behavior rather than a description of how learners will respond (e.g., classify rather than circle)?      

  - clear and observable rather than vague?

     
Is the content Yes No
Not
relevant

  - congruent with the content in the anchor step of the instructional goal analysis?

     
Are/do criteria Yes No
Not
relevant

  - included only when needed to judge a complex task?

     
  - include physical or form attributes?      
  - include purpose attributes?      
  - include aesthetic attributes?      
 - include other relevant attributes?      
Is the performance objective Yes No
Not
relevant

Clear (you can construct an assessment to evaluate learners' mastery)?

     

Feasible in the learning and performance contexts (time, resources, etc.)?

     

Meaningful related to goal and purpose for instruction (not insignificant)?

     

 

Assessment Instruments (10 points)

I. For Objective Test Items
     
A. Goal-centered Criteria. Based on the terminal objective and performance objectives, are the items congruent with the...
Yes
No
Not
Relevant
  - conditions?      
  - behavior?      
  - content?      
  - criteria?      
B. Learner-centered Criteria. Are the items and directions congruent with the target learners... Yes No
Not
Relevant
  - vocabulary, language level?      
  - complexity for developmental level?      
  - contexts?      
  - background and experience?      
  - motivation and interest?      
  - special needs?      
C. Context-centered Criteria for Assessments. Yes No
Not
Relevant
  - are the items and directions:      
          a. authentic with the learning and performance contexts?      
          b. feasible for the contexts?      
  - are required equipment/tools available?      
  - is adequate time available for administration, scoring, analysis?      
  - are adequate personnel available for administration?      
D. Assessment-centered Criteria. Yes No
Not
Relevant
  - all information required to answer provided?      
  - language clear and parsimonious?      
  - correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation?      
  - item formatting rules followed?      
  - professional looking?      

 

II. For Product, Live Performance, and Attitude Assessments
     
A. Central Criteria. Are instructions and criteria
Yes
No
Not
Relevant
  - goal-centered?      
  - learner-centered?      
  - context-centered?      
  - assessment- centered?      
B. Directions. Do directions clearly indicate Yes No
Not
Relevant
  - what is to be done?      
  - how it is to be done?      
  - any needed resources, facilities, equipment?      
  - any constraints on time, format, etc.?      
  - appropriate guidance for task and learner needs?      

C. Elements or Features to be Rated. Are elements on rating scale or check list

Yes No
Not
Relevant
  - important?      
  - observable?      
  - paraphrased?      
 - sequenced?      
  - stated either neutrally or positively for consistent rating direction?      
D. Rating or Quality Judgment. Are the rating categories Yes No
Not
Relevant
  - consistent in directionality ('yes' reflects a positive rating and 'no' reflects a low rating?      
  - labeled using both numbers and verbal descriptions?      
  - number of rating categories fits quality complexity of task (rarely over three)?      
  - fair in that 0 is used only when element is totally missing?      
  - likely to yield reliable ratings that are      
          consistent across time?      
          agreed upon by two or more persons?      

Contact Me

codone_s@mercer.edu

Office: 478-301-4185